requestId:68499ac656d574.03630758.
The present situation and future research objectives of “Big School”
Author: Shen Shuhua (Associate Professor of Marxism, Bohai University)
Source: “National Forum·Frontiers of Academics”, Issue 06, 2019
Time: Confucius was in the 2570s and the 16th month of Jihai, Bingchen
� The academic community has developed issues such as the inconsistency between authors, book dates, versions, and titles of the authors and articles. Today, the academic community presents two concepts: one is to discuss “Big School” in a certain or a few characters or a certain historical period; the other is to place the discussion of “Big School” in four books, lacking the combination of academic history like the ones conducted in “Mentalism” and “Mencius”. href=”https://www.twstory.online/Tom/%e7%8d%b5%e8%b1%944%e4%b9%8b%e5%8c%85%e9%a4%8a-v-s-%e8%b2%b7%e6%98%a5%e5%bf%83%e5%be%97/”>Cultivate. There are three goals for the future “Big School”: classical interaction, sympathy, and interpretation in history.
The development of Eastern Philosophy in China is divided into different situations, and Eastern Philosophy is carried out by proposing and solving problems; while the development of Chinese Philosophy is realized by establishing and explaining classical methods. In the classical Chinese philosophical system, “Big School” is an article that cannot be ignored. It is independent of “Travels”, and upgraded to “Drafts” and “Mencius”. Even the disputes that later studies it are closely related to the development of academic history after the Han and Tang dynasties. In other words, “Big School” is one end of studying Chinese philosophical history and avoiding it, and Chinese philosophy is not seen.
The academic community is currently in a state of discussion on “Big School”. In order to facilitate students to clarify the issues related to “Big School”, this article discusses the current situation, research characteristics and future research objectives in three aspects.
1. The current situation of “Big School”
“Big School” has been expressed since the Song Dynasty’s supreme belief, and it has nothing to do with it. The academic community’s discussion on “Big School” is not in line with the important issues of the author, the year, version, title and other issues.
About the author and year of the book. Regarding the author of “Big School”, Li Bingxiang (Taiwan) sorted out fourA kind of saying. First, Zhu Zi passed it on, thinking that it was written by Confucius and what Zengzi did; it was written by Zengzi and what gates were written by doors. Second, Yang Jian wrote “Big Learning” not a saint’s book. Third, Wang Bai and Fengfang led the work of Zisi. Fourth, Song Cheng led the liu Xin’s laboratories. In addition to these four ways, there are seven more: one is Ban Gu’s “Seventy Sons of Later Learning”; the second is the words and books of Cheng Kong’s family; the third is the words of Dai Sheng’s work by Chen Yuande; the fourth is the classics of the Confucian scholars of the Mencius of Guo Moruo; the fifth is the words of Xunshi School of Rongyoulan, and Liu also said the same thing; the sixth is the words of Emperor Wen of Zhou, who was the words of King Wen of Zhou; the seventh is the words of Zhao Zehou (Taiwan) who believed that it was written by Dong Zhongshu.
In addition, there are three points to be explained: First, the author of “Big Xue”, before Zhu Xi, the second Cheng had already mentioned it; second, the author of “Big Xue” was written by Zisi, including Li Liwu and Ge Yinliang; third, the author of “Big Xue” is not a saint’s book, and in addition to Yang Jian, there is also Chen Fu (Qian Chu).
Another issue related to the test of the author of “School” is the test of the year and month of “School” being published. Regarding the year and month of “Big Learning”, Li Bengxiang pointed out that Liang Qichao, Huang Jianzhong, and Hu Xingsheng believed that they were before Meng and Xun; Xu Hui believed that they were in the Qin Dynasty; Lin Zhenghua led them in the early days of the war; Wuyi Neixiong (Japanese) believed that they were written during the reign of Emperor Wu of Han, and Fu Wuguang followed them; Cheng Zhongying believed that they were written after Mencius, and that they were all born in the first place, including Chen Lu and Hu Zhixue. Their disagreement point is that the author of “Big Science” belongs to the good nature.
What needs to be supplemented is that there are two views on the year and month of “Big Xue”: one is that Rong Youlan believed that it was in the Qin and Han dynasties, and it belonged to the Xun Xue series; the other is that Luo Wen believed that it was in the late war in the aftermath of Confucius and Zeng and before Mencius and Xunxue, that is, the fifth century BC.
About the revised study of “Big School”. In the history of “Big School”, Ercheng first modified “Big School”. Cheng Jun has “Mingdao Teacher’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master’s Master The second Cheng only changed the text of “Big Learning”, and Cheng changed the words. Zhu Xi divided the “大官网”, which caused constant conflicts in post-school studies. Regarding the “Big School”, Liu Siyuan wrote “A Study on the Ancient and Modern Edition of the Women’s College Students’ Care Club”, which recorded the “Year of the Year from the Han Dynasty to the Ming Dynasty””Night School” was discussed and evaluated based on the science field. Zhu Yizun’s “Study and Examination” contains as many as 240 discussions on “Travels” or “Big School” by scholars from the Han Dynasty to the Qing Dynasty.
In addition, Zhao Chenghou’s “Big Research” lists the revised versions of “Big Study” by 18 people including the second Cheng to Zhang Luxiang, and is a rough summary. Li Bengxiang’s “Research on the Revised Books of the Two Song Dynasties” is based on Zheng Notes and Kong Shu, and includes the revised books of the nine Song Dynasties, two Yuan Dynasties, eighteen Ming Dynasties, ten Qing Dynasties, three Japanese, Korean, and Japanese (Japanese). It also reminds the evolution process and academic research of the version. Its collection is extensive and the examination is detailed, and it is rare to study the revised book of “Research”. Liu Yong’s “The Classic of Changes” mainly discussed the revised version of “Big Learning” in the Ming Dynasty. Cen Yicheng and Ye Guoliang also wrote articles separately, discussing the revision of “Big School” and Lin Zhiqi’s “At the last moment of being invited by a friend. The revised version of “Big School” was discussed. In addition, Liao Yichang, Xu Junya, Cheng Yuanmin, Wang Daqian and others discussed the ancient version of “Big School”.
The title of “Big School” is meaningful. In “Study of the Su Po – Chen Qianchu’s Philosophical Thoughts”, Shin Shuhua sorted out the interpretation of the title of “Study” or the word “Study” and summarized it into four categories: one is Du You’s “Tongdian” called “Study” as the upper school, that is, “Study” is the school; the other is Zheng Xuan’s “Three Ceremony Catalog” believes that “Study” is the study of politics, and Kong Da regards ” The chapter of “Big Learning” discusses the things you have accomplished, and can govern the country.” Zhou Yutong also believes that “big learning” is the mechanism for studying and teaching therapies; third, “big learning” proposed by Zhu Xi’s “big learning” is th
發佈留言